Searches related to: irobot lighthouse instructions Irobot-roomba-535-robotic-vacuum-with- lighthouse-technology.html – 26k – Cached – Similar pages – IRobot Roomba 535 Robotic Vacuum with Lighthouse Technology – Very great deal! … Everything instructions said it would do, it did, recharges fast and … iRobot Roomba 535 Robotic Vacuum with Lighthouse Technology | TV News Irobot– lighthouse/search-html – 73k – Cached – Similar pages –ġ0. Irobot Lighthouse – 6 results like the Sunbeam iRobot Roomba Virtual Wall Lighthouse, iRobot Roomba 500 Series Virtual Wall Lighthouse – 80201, … Irobot Lighthouse – Compare Prices, Reviews and Buy at NexTag … iRobot : Redesign Root: 500 Series: Virtual Wall® Lighthouse™ product/index.jsp?productId=2821601&cp=2842706&parentPage=subcategory – 55k – Cached – Similar pages –Ģ. The Virtual Wall Lighthouse uses an invisible infrared signal to help iRobot Roomba® achieve the most efficient and thorough room-to-room cleaning. iRobot : 500 Series: Virtual Wall® Lighthouse™ So I had a look online to see if I could find an instruction manual (much more convenient than digging through old papers and/or boxes).ġ. I put in fresh batteries to my lighthouse, and the light didn’t come on, and there was no obvious ‘on’ switch. The search that inspired this post tonight was the search for “irobot lighthouse instructions”. Check out the results for “ first person“.ģ results for “first person”, followed by three results for “third person”, then a suggestion for “first person narrative”, followed by the rest of the results. For example, searching for “ carmack suggest” has the first result matching “carmack suggested”.Īnother example is suggesting all sorts of “alternatives” in your main page of results. There are bugs in both the new Google toolbar, and a bug in iGoogle that goes back at least a year, where my first search takes me back to a blank Google page in any version of Firefox)įor example, if I am looking for a verb in particular, it will often change its tense. (actually, it also habitually drops my search entirely. Posted in Miscellaneous, Rants Google doesn’t trust us with our search queries anymoreĪ trend I’ve noticed lately is that Google selectively ignores and “reimagines” my search terms. ![]() So given its dubious nature, I suspect it persists mainly as a way to reassure the company, without actually doing anything (just like the raptor-repellent I keep in my cube, just in case). Nor am I the first to think the content is generally ridiculous. I’m certainly not the first to question this. If you were to be so unlucky to be sued for the contents of an e-mail, it is not certain whether an email disclaimer will protect you from liability in a court of law. ![]() Even said website devoted to them, says: But do they? I think it would be reasonable to think that if they offered iron-clad legal protection everyone would have them, yet I rarely see them attached to emails from US companies, perceived as one of the most litigious countries worldwide. So why do so many people have them (with whole websites devoted to them)?Īt first it seems reasonable to believe they do offer some legal protection, which would explain their popularity. They’re all ridiculously long, nobody reads them, and they break up email conversations in an annoying way. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.” Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. “This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The second thing I noticed, and this is something I’ve definitely seen a lot more of from Australian companies for some reason, was the legal disclaimer. (By the way, I really liked the way Google knew exactly what I meant when I searched for ) It also wouldn’t surprise me if this is the net result most of the time: ![]() The first was the ever-silly “Go Green – please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.” line.ĭoes putting this in actually make people reconsider printing an email? I wonder who started this trait? I suspect it was started with somewhat passive-aggressive intent somewhere where a lot of “technically unsavvy” folks were printing emails, and spread from there. Today I got an email from an Australian company and noticed two things at the bottom of their email.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |